If you’ve ever wondered why a 50MP smartphone camera sometimes takes worse low-light photos than a 12MP DSLR, or why industrial inspection cameras rely on specific pixel specs for precision measurements, the answer likely lies in pixel pitch. This often-overlooked specification is the unsung hero of camera module performance, shaping everything from image quality in consumer devices to the accuracy of industrial machine vision systems. In 2025, as camera technology continues to evolve—with smaller sensors powering everything from smartphones to thermal imaging drones—understanding pixel pitch has never been more critical.
In this guide, we’ll demystify pixel pitch, break down its impact oncamera moduleperformance, explore how it varies across industries, and share actionable insights for choosing the right pixel pitch for your application. Whether you’re a product designer, a photography enthusiast, or an engineer building industrial imaging systems, this deep dive will equip you with the knowledge to make informed decisions about camera module specifications. What Is Pixel Pitch in Camera Modules?
Let’s start with the basics: pixel pitch (also referred to as pixel size in some contexts) is the physical distance between the centers of two adjacent pixels on a camera sensor, measured in micrometers (µm). For example, a sensor with a 3.45 µm pixel pitch means each pixel is spaced 3.45 micrometers apart from its neighbor. This is not to be confused with pixel count (megapixels), which refers to the total number of pixels on the sensor—while megapixels determine resolution, pixel pitch dictates how much light each pixel can collect and how much detail the sensor can resolve.
To visualize this, imagine a grid of squares on a canvas: the pixel pitch is the gap between each square, while the canvas itself represents the sensor size. A smaller pitch means more squares (pixels) fit into the same canvas, increasing sampling density—the rate at which the sensor captures spatial details. Conversely, a larger pitch creates more space between pixels, allowing each pixel to cover a larger area of silicon and collect more photons (light particles).
This fundamental trade-off—sampling density vs. light collection—is the cornerstone of pixel pitch design. As we’ll explore later, there’s no “one-size-fits-all” pixel pitch; the optimal value depends entirely on the camera’s intended use case.
How Pixel Pitch Impacts Camera Module Performance
Pixel pitch directly influences three key performance metrics of camera modules: light sensitivity, resolution and detail, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Let’s break down each of these relationships:
Light Sensitivity and Low-Light Performance
The most significant impact of pixel pitch is on a sensor’s ability to capture light. Larger pixels have more silicon surface area to collect photons, which translates to better low-light performance. For example, a smartphone camera with a 1.0 µm pixel pitch (common in modern high-megapixel phones) will struggle in dim lighting because each pixel captures far less light than a 4.0 µm pixel in a DSLR sensor. This is why flagship smartphones often use “pixel binning” technology—combining four 1.0 µm pixels into one 2.0 µm pixel—to mimic the light-gathering power of larger pixels.
In contrast, industrial metrology cameras like the Kaya Vision Iron 661 use a 3.45 µm pixel pitch to balance light sensitivity with precision. While this pitch is smaller than a DSLR’s, the sensor’s quantum efficiency (63% at 520 nm) and low temporal noise (below 2.7 e⁻) compensate for reduced light collection, ensuring accurate measurements even in controlled lighting conditions.
Resolution and Spatial Detail
Smaller pixel pitch increases sampling density, which allows the sensor to capture finer details. For applications like semiconductor wafer inspection or automotive part quality control, a small pixel pitch (e.g., 2.5 µm or less) enables the camera to resolve tiny defects that would be invisible to a sensor with a larger pitch. This is why high-resolution machine vision cameras often feature pixel pitches under 4 µm—they prioritize detail over low-light performance, as these systems typically operate in well-lit environments.
However, there’s a limit to how small pixel pitch can go before diffraction limits kick in. When pixels are too small, the optical system (lens) can’t project light onto them with enough precision, leading to blurred details and reduced sharpness. This is a critical consideration for camera module designers: shrinking pixel pitch beyond a certain point provides no additional resolution benefit.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
SNR measures the ratio of useful image signal to unwanted noise (e.g., graininess in photos). Smaller pixel pitch reduces the amount of light each pixel collects, which lowers the signal and increases noise—especially in low-light conditions. For example, a sensor with a 1.2 µm pixel pitch may have an SNR of 30 dB in dim light, while a 2.4 µm pixel sensor from the same manufacturer could achieve 45 dB under the same conditions.
To mitigate this, camera module makers use advanced sensor technologies like back-illuminated (BSI) sensors and stacked CMOS designs, which improve light absorption in small pixels. Teledyne FLIR’s infrared (IR) camera modules, for instance, use 8 µm and 15 µm pixel pitches for mid-wave IR (MWIR) systems to maintain high SNR while reducing the size, weight, and power (SWaP-C) of the modules.
Pixel Pitch Across Industries: Application-Specific Design
Pixel pitch requirements vary dramatically across industries, as each application prioritizes different performance metrics. Let’s explore how pixel pitch is optimized for three key sectors in 2025:
Consumer Electronics (Smartphones, Cameras)
In the smartphone industry, the trend toward smaller pixel pitches (0.7 µm to 1.4 µm) is driven by the need for high megapixel counts in compact sensors. For example, a 1-inch sensor with a 1.0 µm pixel pitch can fit 200MP, while a 1.4 µm pitch would limit it to 108MP. However, these small pixels sacrifice low-light performance, so manufacturers pair them with larger apertures (e.g., f/1.4 lenses) and pixel binning to compensate.
For consumer DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, the focus is on larger pixel pitches (3.0 µm to 6.0 µm) to deliver superior image quality and dynamic range. A full-frame sensor with a 4.3 µm pixel pitch, for instance, can capture more light and detail than a smartphone sensor, making it ideal for professional photography.
Industrial Machine Vision and Metrology
Industrial camera modules demand pixel pitches that balance resolution and measurement accuracy. Metrology cameras used for inspecting 300mm semiconductor wafers or automotive body panels often use a 3.45 µm pixel pitch (like the Sony IMX 661 sensor in Kaya Vision’s Iron 661 camera). This pitch provides 128MP resolution with a 56.7 mm diagonal sensor, enabling the camera to capture fine details while maintaining a large enough field of view to inspect entire objects at once.
Shrinking the pixel pitch further (e.g., to 2.0 µm) would increase resolution but reduce the sensor’s full-well capacity (the amount of light a pixel can hold before saturation) and dynamic range. For industrial applications, this trade-off is often unacceptable, as accurate edge detection and measurement require low noise and high dynamic range.
Infrared Thermal Imaging
IR camera modules face unique pixel pitch challenges, as smaller pixels reduce the size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) of thermal imaging systems—critical for drones, wearable devices, and automotive thermal sensors. In 2025, Teledyne FLIR’s Neutrino SX8-CZF camera uses an 8 µm MWIR pixel pitch, down from 15 µm in previous generations, to create compact thermal cores for long-range surveillance drones.
However, smaller IR pixels require faster f-numbers (wider apertures) to maintain sensitivity, as they collect fewer infrared photons. This means that while smaller pixel pitches enable miniaturization, they also demand more advanced optical design to avoid compromising performance.
Balancing Pixel Pitch and Sensor Size: The Sweet Spot
Pixel pitch doesn’t exist in isolation—it must be paired with sensor size to achieve optimal performance. Sensor size dictates the total number of pixels and the field of view (FOV), while pixel pitch defines sampling density. To visualize this balance, imagine a trade-off diagram:
• X-axis (pixel pitch): Smaller values increase resolution but reduce light collection.
• Y-axis (sensor diagonal): Larger values expand FOV but increase system cost and size.
The “sweet spot” for most high-performance camera modules is the upper-left quadrant of this diagram: a small pixel pitch for high resolution, paired with a large sensor for a wide FOV. Kaya Vision’s Iron 661 and Zinc 661 cameras exemplify this balance, with a 3.45 µm pitch and a 3.6-inch sensor format delivering 70.8 dB dynamic range and 9,825 e⁻ full-well capacity.
When designing a camera module, engineers must also consider four interrelated constraints:
1. Lens image circle: The lens must uniformly illuminate the entire sensor.
2. System size: Larger sensors require bigger, more expensive lenses.
3. Lighting uniformity: A wider FOV demands tighter control over illumination.
4. Data bandwidth: More pixels generate more data, requiring faster interfaces (e.g., PCIe Gen 3 or CoaXPress 2.1).
2025 Trends in Pixel Pitch Technology
The camera module industry is evolving rapidly, with three key trends shaping pixel pitch design in 2025:
1. Smaller IR Pixel Pitches for SWaP-C Optimization
As thermal imaging becomes mainstream in consumer and industrial devices, manufacturers are shrinking IR pixel pitches to 8 µm (MWIR) and 12 µm (LWIR). This enables compact thermal cores for smartphones, wearables, and IoT devices without sacrificing detection range.
2. AI-Driven Pixel Pitch Compensation
Artificial intelligence is being used to mitigate the drawbacks of small pixel pitches. For example, AI noise reduction algorithms can improve low-light performance in smartphone cameras with 1.0 µm pixels, while machine learning models enhance measurement accuracy in industrial cameras with small pixel pitches.
3. Hybrid Pixel Pitches for Multimodal Imaging
Some camera modules now feature variable pixel pitches—larger pixels for low-light conditions and smaller pixels for high-resolution daylight capture. This hybrid design, seen in next-gen automotive cameras, balances versatility and performance.
How to Choose the Right Pixel Pitch for Your Camera Module
Selecting the optimal pixel pitch depends on your application’s priorities. Follow these steps to make an informed decision:
1. Define your core requirements: Do you need high resolution, low-light performance, or a wide FOV? For example, a security camera prioritizes low-light sensitivity (larger pitch), while a barcode scanner needs high resolution (smaller pitch).
2. Consider the operating environment: Industrial cameras in bright labs can use smaller pitches, while outdoor surveillance cameras need larger pixels for low-light reliability.
3. Balance pixel pitch with sensor size: Use the trade-off diagram to find the sweet spot between resolution and FOV.
4. Evaluate supporting technologies: Look for sensors with BSI design, pixel binning, or low-noise readout circuits to compensate for small pixel pitches.
Conclusion
Pixel pitch is the foundation of camera module performance, influencing everything from image quality to measurement accuracy across consumer, industrial, and aerospace applications. In 2025, as camera technology continues to miniaturize and evolve, understanding how pixel pitch interacts with sensor size, optics, and use case requirements will be essential for anyone designing or selecting camera modules.
Whether you’re building a smartphone camera, an industrial inspection system, or a thermal imaging drone, remember: megapixels aren’t everything. The right pixel pitch, paired with a well-designed sensor and lens, will always deliver better performance than a high-megapixel sensor with a poorly optimized pitch. By prioritizing pixel pitch in your camera module specifications, you’ll unlock the full potential of your imaging system—no matter the application.